How sure is the exclusivity aspect of this? I get it that there is only one vendor, this company, but I'm too jaundiced as regards govt & money & power to easily be persuaded that the mandate is totally exclusive and that only this company will be the recipient.
Now I guess I could be wrong, but this is just too much of a birdnest on the ground. Hell, its not a birdnest.... its like the value of the Smithsonian exclusively showing up in this one bank account.
Its too good to be true. Is anyone able to convolute (and I deliberately chose to say it that way because, as far as I can see, convolution is the only way to distort the good in this thing into something bad).... anyway, is there anyone able to fabricate and convolute and twist any aspect of this "MANDATE" into a loophole where we end up with NADA?
I'm just too jaundiced, I guess, LOL.
Imperial Whazoo