Replies to post #71018 on Sunergy, Inc. (fka SNEY)

[RocketmanChicago]

Hello "CK", your point is noted and rightly so,
...indeed many factors come into play when affecting PPS, yet however small,
just as a flow of good news affects PPS, I cannot help but to think it also works the other way. Perhaps newbies ready to invest, find themselves hasitant when faced with the iHUB battle of AMS/SNEY, and as "Fangster" pointed out, some of the shareholders did sell their positions resulting from said negativity, I know because I spoke with them.

As for all other changes, I have no choice but to trust SNEY's headship and direction, I hope said changes turn out positive as the auditor change, (timing in filings reflect that) they are calling the shots, and we are not.

If nothing else, the letter from Steve has brought additional clarity into an otherwise nebulous environment with the shareholders.

I expect good things to come about from all this, it has been long enough and many of us want
to see the road ahead clear and prosperous.


"Rocketman", . . . .

[daisy duke]

Good post. Lots of good info and I agree. I wondered what you know about the AMS mishandling of the books. I never heard that before and read that SNEY was on the pinksheets in April 2010 (before they acquired AMS in October 2010) because of unfiled financials and an outstanding bill for $40K with BDO, which was later paid. I also read that the CE was placed on SNEY because of a promotion of SNEY stock which is apparently not allowed. I'm confused because everyone says SNEY has no money/income right now and needs to raise money soon, and the Tantalus guys (aka AMS) were the ones who came up with the $40K for the Hazen report, which was for the mutual benefit of both companies. So, I'm just wondering what AMS did to mishandle their books and why I've never heard this before, when those same guys are the ones had the money to pay for the Hazen report. Got any details?