InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Hankman84

08/30/12 6:27 AM

#17621 RE: Traderfan #17611

I think youre right about AMEX but wrong about swedens Nasdaq OMX

Partly because the different sizes and countries. SIAF wont drown among all the other companies on the Nasdaq OMX Sverige compared to AMEX.

Here in Sweden, we havefew higher valued Agri-Culture companies who have higher valuation and less profit ahead than SIAF.

I think Sweden is an excellent list for SIAF, to get proper valuation.

Add the fact of Sweden shareholders own about 50% of SIAF.
icon url

RealDutch

08/30/12 6:57 AM

#17627 RE: Traderfan #17611

You have 5 dead chinese companies in your portfolio, all of them are or were trading on a national exchange here in the US.



LMAO. 12 out of 17 are dead Chinese companies because they were/are trading on Nasdaq. Because Nasdaq destroyed the share price. That's because they ARE on my buy-list. What the hell is your point?

There is only one delisted from AMEX and that's because the market cap dropped below $25M. A simple and objective rule.
icon url

Fluid

08/30/12 7:55 AM

#17638 RE: Traderfan #17611

The point is that if (or rather when) SIAF moves up to a major list, no matter if it's Nasdaq or AMEX (even if I would prefer AMEX) we will increase our chances of getting a higher valuation due to the possibility for funds to buy the stock. I am totally convinced that there will be many funds interested in the rapid growth that SIAF can offer and it's a good hold on both short and long term. That together with some kind of PR campaign among the investor community can do a lot for the PPS.

The second thing is the dual listing in Sweden which will draw a lot of attention since there are not many agricultural/food companies on OMX. The thing that SIAF is owned by so many swedes will give even more PR and it can be really fun watching the development in Sweden. I am not sure but I don't think there are such growth companies as SIAF on OMX trading at such a low PE. So even here the chances of a more fair valuation are highly probable.

There is also an overall trend to invest in "good" sustainable companies as in SIAFs case with an organic food production. These things are especially important in Sweden since swedes seem to be more aware. Also there are some funds that focus in investing in food and agriculture. And I am pretty sure that they would be very, very interested...