Replies to post #33620 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[geob]

frog ......

so you are saying ......

DNAG needed $22,000 .....

in a realy bad way ........

that they sold 1,400,000 shares .......

at the run up ........

then ......

every one else sold out .......

because we maxed out above 7% ......

of the last closeing .......

you frog are dilusional .......

so I ask you frog ......

when are you and the boggey men ........

going to be done? .......

I would love to see DNAG take that $22,000 ......

next week and buy back their own shares .......

at this rate ......

they could probably buy back ......

over 2mil shares ......

NOT BAD --- GEO

[aries4747]

Frogdreaming, I've never seen a more succinct synopsis of the truth. Thanks, you rolled 1,000 posts into a laser beam of clarity. May not want to see it, but it's impossible to ignore.

[bag8ger]

frog,

If we accept your conclusion that those shares were dumped by the company, rather than paid to someone for services rendered, and that your 40% figure is accurate, that leaves 60% to be accounted for, which leaves plenty of room for the short-selling game to be played

.