InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Artiztic1

08/21/12 12:46 PM

#195062 RE: Rawnoc #195054

Here's some reality since you prefer it.

(1) SAIC wasn't there post run to examine how long it takes to clean out the processor post runs. So they only saw what Honest John wanted them to see - that's a FACT.

(2) Monofills won't dig themselves up, another FACT.

(3) Raggertail processed over a short run is no big deal - read one again.


Lastly, "Two small "tumbleweeds" of clean dense bailing were present from processing some paper mill ragger tail waste.

Two small tumbleweeds doesn't sound like they ran much raggertail at all, from processing "some" not tons but "some" - so much for any proof that raggertail is viable.



The Fairy Ragger Tale again? I far more prefer reality.

(1) NYSE: SAI's assessment, which was based on 72 hours of actual hands on examination, though maybe not as good studying the process on a message board, it took everything into account as part of a BUSINESS PLAN. Their insight is far superior than anything we can speculate.

(2) NYSE: RKT produces thousands of tons of plastic waste per day in addition to raggertail and their monofills for plastic waste are plastic-only -- zero raggertail.

(3) "The raggertail was demonstrated to be successfully processed during a visit by Rock-Tenn"

www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8491922 <~~~this was further explained in detail at the AGM

"Residue was not removed from the pre-melt reactor so that the internal walls could be examined. When the reactor was opened, the inside walls were remarkably clean. Two small "tumbleweeds" of clean dense bailing wire bunches were present from processing some paper mill ragger tail waste. Normally, residue and metals would be removed from the pre-melt periodically during operation."