Hi Conrad AIM dofusdaddy link. I do not recognize this. . .hold on. . I will open it. . .Huh? I see a zillion zeros. . .Never seen this site before. Too time consuming to get into it now.
"For a useful start on the Lichello Standard AIM there are spread-sheet available that shows you the basics of AIm you do not have to read any difficult books if you want to invest with this basic method right away!" http://www.dofusdaddy.com/aim_internet.htm";
The above statement which contains the link for the site which you do not recognize is from the board that you moderate. Also, I think one has to read his book before investing right away. It is an easy, not a diffcult read.
"I propose that on this run, knowing the future, I will optimise the system for these prices. Would you say that is OK? The point here is that Vortex does not have a Standard Version. All the parameters are variables
When comparing and because all the Vortex parameters are variable, it seems that Vortex will either will beat or equal the comparing stock. Look at the Clive example. Vortex vs. regular AIM. At the $40.96.Vortex has a better monetary position than regular AIM. At the $40.96 the BTB AIM method that I use has a better monetary position than regular AIM and Vortex. Vortex says that it could equal my results also because its parameters are variable. However, the only problem is that we are investing and Vortex can't have it both ways. AT the initial $100.00 it has to apply its parameters to either Clive or to my method. If it used Clives, I would beat Vortex. If it used mine, we would be equal. We both could probably beat Vortex if we observed its action with its own parameters used by its key operator. This is why I introduced the GE example. You can decide on everything on your own then optimise the Run. . . that is ok with me.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
