InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Neverending

08/13/12 4:16 PM

#79354 RE: 1Coyote #79352

1Coyote-How can you believe the MicroOS (MOS) has any value considering EDIG strung share holders along for years while they supposedly tried in vain to find anybody to buy a license? The only way to see any potential in EDIG is to engage in wild speculation. EDIG is completely unwilling to be candid about its business prospects and always has been and I believe the reason for that is EDIG is simply a vehicle for the real investors, the financiers, to unload their millions of shares. The lack of any specifics is completely unacceptable. Tell 5 of you friends about your great investment in EDIG and how they need to keep everything secret and they will tell you to run away quickly.

Also, keep in mind in the several failed "businesses" EDIG has engaged in the longer the period of time with no success the more likely the business will fail. "NUNchi" tM is getting a bit long in the tooth. Delays and stretched out time lines have never resulted in good news for share holders.
icon url

LawyerLong

08/13/12 6:04 PM

#79356 RE: 1Coyote #79352

I think you have successfully made the argument that there are different opinions about EDIG. In my opinion of course.

LL
icon url

heybrad

08/14/12 12:32 AM

#79367 RE: 1Coyote #79352

except we have management telling us MOS nor any of the flash patents have anything to do with nunchi..

so it doesn't matter what is thought about this its patently false. I could think Steve Jobs is gonna be the next CEO of Edig but it doesn't make it reasonable because someone thinks it. teve Jobs is deceased by the way so it's impossible even if someone thinks it's gonna happen or could happen.

there is only one patent pending that is not part of the nucnhi platform. So right there the info is wrong again and it again it doesn't matter that someone thiks it/

Soeomne thought 400 lawyers were added to the edig case.. didn't make it true nor even reasonable to say

someone thought samsung was gonna lie with edig and made a settlement where they weren'tgonnatell the judge they settled and the agreement was samsung would let it go to markman even though they settled and help edig get a favorable markman in their suits against each other. not only was this illegal but simply not true and just because someone thought it didn't make it true.

I could give you numerous numerous more examples... but the bottom line is people thinking something doesn't make it true or reasonable especially if everything we are told by managmenbet says it's the opposite of what is trying to be implied.