"Let's say for the sake of argument that the results of the blind test were as earthshatteringly impressive as Biocurex implies"
i believe that the blind test results were GOOD but not as good as the company want us to believe and remember that the SEC investigating bocx for DATA accuracy claims and few other things.
"This scenario is very plausible in my eyes"
but not in my eyes
"That being the case, your theory about Abbott having the upperhand is utter foolishness. The fact that we are small and on the pinks is irrelavent, if the technology is on the money"
the foolishness is to believe that a that a PINK SHEET( under investigation by the sec) company with 35 mill market cap have the upper hand against a 66 BIL mammoth company like AABOTT.
and dont forget that they did not even Allowed bocx to use ABBOTT name without their written consent.
"Most of the longtermers are convince that the technology is everything it's hyped up to be."
most of them but not all of them. Im long and i believe SOME of the hype but all of it.
"You obviously question it, but part of you believes it cause you bought some. You probably won't sell till you know definitively whether it works."
again...im long on bocx, and i believe in recaf tech and it will make money for our company and for us but i DO NOT believe its "The holy grail of cancer diagnosis."
and i do not believe the 90+ recaf accuracy in detecting cancer (i hate to say it but even the SEC is on my side in questioning THE 90+ accuracy claims)