InvestorsHub Logo

presence

08/05/12 2:15 PM

#125 RE: stervc #124

Sounds enticing! I think I would probably assume the worst and go to 250 million shares (or around 40 million share avg. per acquisition) for worst-case scenario. Still well worth it considering the price we're at. What would be nice for the company to do (assuming all acquisitions are successfully completed) is to create some sort of stock buyback thereafter. If they were to show profits of this magnitude and anticipate future increase in earnings, I would hope that is the case, especially if the stock price was being held down. Or, they would be "forced" to do an R/S and uplisting, which would suck because R/S' suck in general, but it would be beneficial if it meant hitting the NASDAQ. We would be realizing a much higher P/E ratio. It all comes down to those acquired companies and whether the people in charge there realize that giving up a little near-term value will benefit them exponentially in the long-term. They will be handsomely rewarded if dilution is below 20 million shares per acquisition.

10 bagger

08/05/12 6:53 PM

#126 RE: stervc #124

We are all IMO on a mesage board.. If you could provide any investment banker with over 10 Million in earnings with a growth objective that has benn proven,, I'll show you a banker that will sell 30% or less of your company in a Public offering and raise you at least 30 Mil and let you keep 70% of the company.. The stock would prob be issued at 12 to 15 per share and would be recieved well by the underwriting books..

If some one had that option why would they accept a pennystock,, no cash and complete loss of any control of thier company for a penny stock..

I'm not saying it can't be done but if you owned 10 Million plus in earnings would yo rather have 30 Mil in capitol and control or be part of a penny stock.. hank

trendtraderz

08/07/12 3:55 AM

#127 RE: stervc #124