Replies to post #10704 on Health Discovery Corp (HDVY)

[LocWolf]

Absolutely not, first of all the patent agency struck down all 15 claims within Intel’s patent. Next Intel has amended claim 1,6 and 11 and also defined Weston’s claims in patent 7475048 and are trying to explain/show the office a understanding of Westons patent language. They are also requesting reconsideration under their new claims/remarks filed by Intel.

I gather that HDVY is working on a counter move in case the patent agency agrees with the new claims/remarks by Intel. There is no reason for HDC to enter further documentation/counter until the patent office makes a follow up decision but as it states the patent office refused all 15 claims by Intel's patent 7685077.


re: "Supplemental Response after Non-Final Rejection"

I would need to go back into the patent office to see this part. I only posted the basic last 3 filed documets. I do recall about 5 others for 3/12 but I don't have time to check this out today. I'm sure other posters have seen this post and will be hot on checking it out today.

[LocWolf]

King, the supplemental response is part of what I posted. It is exactly a letter heading stating Intel has amended a response. The response is the Claims/Remark data some of which I mentioned. The "SA" itself is just the letter head submitted to the Patent office. The entire SA consists of the SA, ClM,claims and REM-remarks.

That is all that amounts to so no worry yet far too early. The patent office did indeed reject their patent based on just looking lightly at Westons patent 7475048 as submitted by HDC, and of course we already knew the Guyon paper would not be strong enough to counter Intel's patent.

King, look in the "Image file wrapper" area!

In case other wish or need the docket number is 42P21656RE seial 90/011938.