InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

buenokite

07/25/12 7:36 PM

#192145 RE: Rawnoc #192138

It's "progress" like this that I believe drives traders and even longs to sell. I do have to admit though you accurately captured the gist of the AGM.
icon url

Estimated_Prophet

07/25/12 10:34 PM

#192162 RE: Rawnoc #192138

I'm surprised the drum would be the only issue with P1. Seeing P2 for the first time was like love at first site. It made P1 look like a dinosaur. I imagined it would struggle to stay running consistently, and have a high level of maintenance. Surprised it wouldn't receive a near total makeover.

You make the SWP thing seem as if the company had no plans of it coming soon, when I'm sure they had a decent idea. Even if I felt Q4 was going to be a great quarter, I too would say Q1.

If they start producing and selling fuel within 30-40% of the claims in N.F. on a consistent basis(even 2-3 weeks straight), I don't think we'd be trading under $1.50 for too long after that.











icon url

dreaminbig

07/26/12 6:47 AM

#192175 RE: Rawnoc #192138

Why use 2000 lb/hour limit during the presentation? Can you show me any proof that it has doubled? Or is that just forward thinking?

What is half as much up time? What is full time up time? How many hours a week is the one processor running? W


(7). I'm going to repeat -- the entire presentation including forecasts was based on the 2,000 lb/hour limit which was mentioned continuously during the presentation. That limit has now doubled. To ignore the effect of something DOUBLING yet still using the same assumptions is ludicrous. They'll need HALF as much up time now as before to get cash flow positive.