InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

CEMJQ Multi-Millionaire

07/22/12 9:13 PM

#102634 RE: K1 #102633

briscoe has lunched with the eskimo mother in law and she controls 40 acres (room for tents and everything). briscoe will come in and solve the battle of the century. I'm sure he will be front & center in this Frontline Exclusive.
icon url

MarketGeometry

07/22/12 9:15 PM

#102635 RE: K1 #102633

Old news. Check page 92-100 on the 3D pictures of target drilling areas.

http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/75403350?access_key=key-28nrx0k65aln3ctphrru
icon url

LBSRtoDollars

07/22/12 9:16 PM

#102636 RE: K1 #102633

i doubt that yet another scathing indictment of the proposed pebble mine will have any effect on the PPS of NAK and definnitely not the PPS of LBSR... this kind of propaganda has been pushed for years now...
icon url

blue finch

07/22/12 9:23 PM

#102637 RE: K1 #102633

Hope so. I want more shares and remember the land we own is on state designated mining land
icon url

scoreoneortwo

07/22/12 9:26 PM

#102638 RE: K1 #102633

This is shown next to "What is President Obama's Track Record on HIV/AIDS?
Typical of PBS. Another hatchet job. Which reminds me. Tiffany and other "socially conscious" companies are boycotting minerals from here so I will not be buying my wife any more jewlery from there.

The good part is that hopefully drill result will come back from BC showing good reserves as LBSR is in a much more advantageous location than Pebbble.
And thank God for states like Arizona that allow and encourgage mining.
Remember this when you vote in November.

Of course that makes no difference to the "greenies" who never saw a US mineral they liked only the fishies and little grizzlies who are not that little.

In the meantime the Chinese are buying up all the minerals while we hamstring our miners.

This is a risky stock until drilling results but even more so with the restraints put on our miners.

They talk jobs but only for paper pushers!
icon url

deadjim

07/22/12 9:29 PM

#102639 RE: K1 #102633

already priced in NAK's chart........
not to mention this has been known for years.







.....
icon url

LongHawl

07/22/12 9:31 PM

#102640 RE: K1 #102633

The last two weeks have been good for LBSR

during that time we had the Huffingtion Post
hit piece and the Rather video hit piece,

This is just part of the green push around
the closing of the EPA comment period

You cant tell me the timing of all this was
coincidental
icon url

jtyler

07/22/12 10:37 PM

#102647 RE: K1 #102633

The fact that we have one of the lowest impact on the environment at BC and the pps did not move much on that announcement. You can expect to see no movement on tv shows of EPA fears for the "Pebble Mine" not "Big Chunk" therefor not directly pointed at us we should see a .001 drop in pps just to tickle the bashers booty. Also as some mentioned this is old news and been going on for years.

IMO any environmental news would have to be directly pointed at LBSR and blocking LBSR path to completing projects to actually have an effect on the pps. As you can see this is happening to NAK. Heads up EPA war with NAK. LBSR is hardly on the EPA radar... for now.

For LBSR pps to move up or down substantially will be the cause of the anticipated news. The news of the drill plan, BC or HM first? Funding plan how dilutive and do we have enough? after those moves the biggest mother move for the past few years should come when drilling is complete results are pulled out. Keep in mind all the NR mentioned above could shoot the PPS up or down depending the outcome. Other NRs are coming but they should be a lot smaller and pps should move maybe 10%-20% nothing too big.

ALL IMO!