moving targets have been set from early on >> it's the short and distort done by the PROS >> who are equally responsible for the P&D >> PROS make money working both sides of JBII
which is why i have to wonder >> why is it ok for *investment* in the A co. to be considered >> good >> but said investment in jbi is >> er >> bad
why is it just swell for the A co. to take 8+ years >> to >> er >> establish themselves >> and jbi's 3 years to transition and scale is considered a negative
funny thing re: those who tout for a private co. that has yet to make public >> SS >> what investors got for said investment >> and financials
but mostly what i find so disingenuous >> are 2 aspects *not* recognized >> first is JBI's initial business model changing and why testing and tweaking re: the beast >> aka P2O >> would come about >> due to external (potential and existing partners) and internal feedback >>
monday's AGM gives the next round of corp intent >> it will also answer some questions >> impart and update specific info >> and i expect >> it will raise new questions
suspect i'll know by the sequence >> what of the 3 potential outcomes i posted about after reading that loaded pr out on 5.15.12 >> comes to pass (my interest is one of timing and vindication)
all 3 <potential outcomes> financially benefit JBI LT shareholders >> and imo current mgmt is as aware as prior mgmt >> which is why one had to be a shareholder as of 6.15.12 >> re: proxy >> it's the tally of the votes
how *coincidental* that so many larger *blocks* of JBII shares were MIA re: proxies >> most that i'm aware of have been dealt with >> but i'm still waiting on info from one JBI long whose shares are held via etrade
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
