InvestorsHub Logo

cheynew

07/20/12 6:38 AM

#84091 RE: alvaroc2 #84090

Another hatchet job. Not what we needed.

asmarterwookie

07/20/12 7:44 AM

#84099 RE: alvaroc2 #84090

Adam Frankenstein...gotta have money to make money...this guy sounds bitter towards Peregrine....
C'mon...we now have..was it 104 million shares....value bavi at 1 billion.....write your silly story now....

more noise and splashing to muddy the waters....

he's probably involved with the last of those shorts who didn't cover at rebalancing...

I still feel that there are those that will stop at nothing to get your shares...

wook

PGG76109

07/20/12 7:58 AM

#84103 RE: alvaroc2 #84090

There is it a bad write up before any good ones. Damn I hate this bs. PG

biopharm

07/20/12 10:16 AM

#84143 RE: alvaroc2 #84090

Looks like the author Adam Feuerstein has a lot more troubles in his past with being sued and many other ethical issues about writing one sided wall street stories

I hope anyone who is going to read any of his articles regarding Peregrine will see the true Adam Feuerstein below:

Adam Feuerstein

http://www.exposeadam.com/

Protector

07/20/12 6:50 PM

#84232 RE: alvaroc2 #84090

Thanks alvaroc. What can I say, AF, DD and company all sick in the same bed and they clearly don't like Peregrine.

I can understand that they are frustrated and write biased articles.

AF writes about dilution but forgets to say that this cheap ATM way of financing holds against owning our pipeline, IP, expertise, etc without loans or Risc Investors looking over our shoulder. Furthermore now that management starts raising new institutional investors and are thinking about a 20/30Milj loan with Avid as collateral and actually to everybody's surprise didn't use the ATM to much in the low pps period, well exactly know he starts about dilution.

Then on page 3 in the part on shorting he lets pass the nonsense about a testimony that shortens are good because they create more liquidity. I think he forgets that for every share shorted a lending program block a share that can no longer participate. And if he is talking about intra-day shorting well then they have to close there position and whatever liquidity they may have created is zero-ed out.

I know why I don't have a subscription to The Street. If nobody supervises that guy then the others aren't supervised either which means the complete eZine is worthless because you never know when they write the trued or when there agenda is at work.