InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

djgordon

07/14/12 12:28 AM

#1482 RE: dude iligence #1481

Can I get a "like" button?
icon url

Paul Wall

07/14/12 12:48 AM

#1483 RE: dude iligence #1481

+1
icon url

craigers

07/14/12 12:59 AM

#1484 RE: dude iligence #1481

AWESOME! I think we have a winner +2
icon url

MARKSMAN

07/14/12 2:15 AM

#1485 RE: dude iligence #1481

+3 lol
icon url

dshell

07/14/12 8:48 AM

#1486 RE: dude iligence #1481

Great post, gonna sticky to my wall!
icon url

jamigo

07/14/12 9:59 AM

#1487 RE: dude iligence #1481

Great post as usual and we thank you, Dude. Newbs, ignore this man at your peril. Follow his posts. =^)
icon url

Kenswift

07/14/12 10:08 AM

#1488 RE: dude iligence #1481

Love the post Dude. Going to post on my board and give you full credit.
icon url

ChubsyWubsy

07/14/12 12:29 PM

#1489 RE: dude iligence #1481

Great post! Should be wall paper for this and every other ticker board
icon url

Goldenson

07/14/12 1:45 PM

#1490 RE: dude iligence #1481

Great day $63k now $51k up from $41k $22k loss now only $12k. The newbies can learn valuable lessons from losses this substantial

1. Don't buy into the hype of the first day when the pps is already up several hundred percent.

2. If you violate rule 1 and do buy the first day and it goes up several hundred percent sell with a profit.

3. If you violate rules 1 and 2 and the pps drops till your flat, SELL IMMEDIATELY.

4. If you violate rules 1,2, and 3 and the pps drops below what you paid for it. SELL IMMEDIATELY THE TRADE IS NOT GOING AS YOU PLANNED. Take a small loss. You can always buy back cheaper. And with more shares.

5. If you violate rules 1,2,3,and 4 look in the mirror and say I'm a stupid bagholder and this sucks and I don't ever want to be a bagholder again.

6. If you violate rules 1,2,3,4 and 5 you need remedial bagholder training and should consider Mutual Funds.




This is one of the realest posts I've seen on this board. To break it down further:

One buys 100,000 shares at .63 = $63,000
Then the trade goes against you to .51
If you cut loss and sell, you'll get $51,000 with a loss of $12,000. But you live to play another day. Then, you wait for a nice dip or comfortable lower entry. In this case, you enter at .41.
At .41, your $51,000 will buy you 124,390 shares . You're still in the game.
Price goes back to just .51 and your 124,000 shares becomes = $63,439 (i.e. $439 profit)

But...

If you didn't cut your loss and wait for a better entry, and the price goes from .63 to .41 and then back up to .51, you'd still be out $12,000. You only break even if the price goes back to .63.

Bottom line is that takes half the effort to recoup your loss if you exit with a small loss, and buy back at lower price. But in the example above where you sell and play the rebound, if the price goes back to .63 then you can sell them for $78,365. That's a profit of $15,365.

I understand no one gets in a play at the very lowest and sells at the very top except the promoters, but it goes to show that holding while the trade goes against you substantially is not the best way to trade these junk stocks. I know this from experience.

Worst case scenario with the above example, you sell at .51 and don't get a bounce play. You're out $12,000 only, but you have $51k to play again tomorrow.

Worst case scenario if you hold at .63, waiting for the stock to rebound... It can easily go to .10. You do the maths on that one.
icon url

lmdj22

07/14/12 2:01 PM

#1491 RE: dude iligence #1481

I've been making some dumb moves lately so I think I need to copy and post that in large letters and stick it up on my computer monitor and maybe use a highlighter too.
icon url

lmdj22

07/14/12 2:12 PM

#1492 RE: dude iligence #1481

I think I need to copy and post that in large letters and stick it up on my computer monitor and maybe use a highlighter too.