InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Neverending

07/13/12 10:17 AM

#78709 RE: LawyerLong #78708

No. I meant the Judge in Colorado had the no RAM examiner interview induced wording change background information on the 774 patent application process that was PROBABLY the same info that made the 1996 774 patent infringement suit quietly go away. The 774 was issued in February of 1996 and the infringement suit was filed in August of 1996. The 1996 lawsuit was PRed by EDIG the result was not. When you think about it makes sense. If EDIG won a big 774 infringement victory validation the value of its intellectual property in 1996 wouldnt they have touted it in a PR. No PR = no gain and probably a detriment. Probably for a token "license" if anything. Dont look now but the bid and ask are moving lower! Bid .0261 Ask .03. No volume though. Jerry Polis better finish off selling the rest of those shares. My bet is he will still make money even if he sells at .01.


http://maps.thefullwiki.org/E.Digital_Corporation
Patent infringement litigation

The company filed its first lawsuit for infringement of its patents on August 1, 1996 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California for infringement of patent number 5,491,774. Defendants were Taiwanese corporations Simate Corp. and Leading Accessories Inc. and their North American distributors James H. Rochel and J.T.L. Enterprises Inc. Outcome of that lawsuit is unknown.