Replies to post #35618 on A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board (AIMUSERS)

[Conrad]

Clive, I am jealous as hell. . . . at you Chart Printing Skill :-)

Thanks for sharing that Table.

I notice that for the 4 weeks you have bought for $ 10579

OK, that Over Run of $ 579 is borrowed money :-)
That would be exactly as would happen with my Vortex TurboVest version. . .works like a charm when the price recovers!

Why did you buy for $ 1481 more shares at the same price of 40,96?
Or. . . may be, is that the Lichello’s Residual Buy Advice?????

Was did an actual Investment or a Test Case, as I assumed it was?
**********************
My trade amounts in the Tempered Vortex with the same $ 1200 First Buy at # 80 are 1 week apart:

1200
1104
1015,68
934,424576
No Residual Buy Advice :-)
= Total Bought after initial $ 10000 Starting Buy:
$ 4254,104576

Interesting here is not only that Vortex, for an identical Starting run @ $80 for a Buy at $ 1200 the extra Buying is only $ 4254 but also that the Buys become progressively smaller!!!! This is something I have noticed with the original SPY Demo Run I did in 2010!
This is good if one wants to Brake the buying as the price drops but it is bad in one wants to have the buys become progressively larger, so as to have more effective buying towards the bottom of a Trading Range.

I think no one, except Warren Buffet, can win on all points. . .I run into pro's and con's all the time when I do anything at all :-)