InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

b9molecule

07/07/12 11:19 AM

#1923 RE: daudah #1922

daudah - on a quick perusal of the specs, the Scientrex product doesn't say it can detect PETN explosive, which has been the preferred material terrorists have tried to bring on airplanes. It might detect them but it doesn't say it can. The Quantum Sniffer does. The Scientrex product intake and analysis time seems to approach one minute when combined. Implant's device is considerably faster (8 seconds), which is important for throughput of packages. Implant's new device is a "benchtop" model for cargo screening, Scientrex is a handheld (which does compete with Implant's handheld device). Scientrex is a Canadian company (not that this is a big problem) and Implant is a U.S. company. But perhaps the biggest difference is that the Scientrex product is not in the final stage of Transportation Security Administration testing and approval.

Just my 2c.

nonetheless, interesting find.

icon url

shiloh12

07/07/12 2:09 PM

#1925 RE: daudah #1922

Implants patent portfolo has no direct competition- and they are about to introduce disruptive technology into a sector that has no idea what's going to hit them in the next two years.

The weekend is a great time to peruse their press releases from the last two years. It will clearly illustrate a pattern of direction, as well as document top industry execs leaving their present cush positions at leading competitors to join a fledgling micro cap trading at a buck and change.

All IMO