A new twist on a long held theory Most eloquent and original. "Serial Exaggeration" - that's a first and should go down in the EDIG Sucker Hall of Shame.
"Never have so many paid for so much for a stock that has delivered so little. When you look on the history of the company you realize the "product" was the share holders." It cannot be said any better than this.
And I agree with you about the 1996 Norris case. Brad and I have both tried multiple times to get to the bottom of it, but no one will talk. I thought we would see it surface during the highly vaunted "patent" litigation, but we never saw hide nor hair. I'd love to get the skinny on that.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
