InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

crzzyduke

07/01/12 2:43 PM

#85620 RE: xander1788 #85619

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD


IN THE MATTER OF: TRADEMARK REGISTRATION NO. 4053742

FOR THE MARK: TEPOZ

DATE REGISTERED: NOVEMBER 8, 2011

BLUE AGAVE IMPORTS LLC

VS.

KENT GLOBAL MANAGEMENT LLC


PETITION TO CANCEL

Blue Agave Imports LLC as PETIONER; California;

1439 ½ S Robertson Blvd, Los Angeles, California 90035

To the best of petitioner’s knowledge, the name and address of the current owner of the registration are

Kent Global Management LLC, 21 Muller Road, Kent, Connecticut 06757.

The above-identified petitioner believes that it will be damaged by the above-identified registration, andhereby petitions to cancel the same.

The grounds for cancellation are as follows:

1. The registration was obtained fraudulently, with intent to deceive by reckless disregard for the truth,

solely to reserve rights to the mark as evidenced by the following:

a.) On 13 September 2011, Kent Global Management LLC filed a Use Amendment and provided as aspecimen a label placed upon a bottle. This specimen was provided to allege first use in commercedespite the fact that the specimen had not yet received its Certificate of Label Approval from theU.S. Department of Treasury Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Trade Bureau (see exhibit A – a search of theAlcohol and Tobacco Tax Trade Bureau Public COLA registry for product names bearing the wordand/or lettering “Tepoz”). Under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act and Title 27, United StatesCode §205(e) and Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations Part – 5 Subpart D §5.31 and Part –Subpart F §5.51 distilled spirits cannot and shall not be released from Customs custody and cannot andshall not be sold or shipped or delivered or otherwise introduced in interstate or foreign commerce orreceived therein, unless there is deposited with the appropriate Customs officer at the port of entry theoriginal or a photo static copy of an approved certificate of label approval and the bottles are marked,branded, labeled, or packaged in conformity with §§5.31 through 5.42. Kent Global Management LLCdid not receive a Certificate of Label Approval until February 17, 2012 (see exhibit A). As such, KentGlobal Management LLC could not release its product (tequila) from Customs custody, or sell saidproduct, or use the mark “Tepoz” in commerce that could be lawfully regulated by Congress.

b.) Being that Kent Global Management LLC had not received a Certificate of Label Approval at time of filing a Use Amendment (September 13, 2011) and did not have said certification until February 17, 2012, Kent Global Management could not use the mark “Tepoz” in commerce and could not and did not have a product to sell at the time of filing. Thus, Kent Global Management LLC filed a Use Amendment with the knowledge that it had no product to sell and could not lawfully use the mark “Tepoz” in commerce, thereby falsifying a specimen and providing willful, false statements. As such, Kent Global Management LLC obtained registration for the mark “Tepoz fraudulently, solely to reserve and retain rights to said mark.

In light of the evidence against Kent Global Management LLC, the petitioner questions the validity of the registration for the mark “Tepoz” (registration no. 4053742) and petitions for cancellation of the same.
icon url

crzzyduke

07/01/12 2:45 PM

#85621 RE: xander1788 #85619

yea this is mainly a naming issue basically tepoz was registered but they weren't selling a product so the other company wants to steal the name
icon url

stifflersmom

07/01/12 4:48 PM

#85637 RE: xander1788 #85619

It reminds of when someone here posted a lawsuit that Greg was involved in with his old company. However, that person that posted it made it sound like we were doomed with our new President. Then it became obvious, when I read the case file, that our new President was one of the Plaintiffs and not the actual defendent. And our new President got at least 600K out of that lawsuit.

So, what people like to do here sometimes is try and dig up any kind of dirt they can in order to try and cause panic selling, especially coming off a 300M trading day and a weekend ahead of it. They really want ones bad so they can sell at .0002 for 100% gain. Its just another trick.

Again, wait for Greg to tell us what's up with Azteca. We don't even know if the PR that Azteca put out about BFHJ buying them is real or not. And even so, who cares if there is a trademark issue with Topez Tequila?? Its not even really on the market yet so even if they have to change the name, who cares???? I didn't read all of your links yet, but I will try and read it later xander1788. Thanks for finding and posting it though.

GO BFHJ!!