Replies to post #73413 on QSGI, Inc.(fka QSGI)

[sampson2]

Notably, defense counsel also emailed unofficial notice of the deposition to Plaintiffs counsel on April 30, 2012. (DE 81-2, Ex. 15). Despite these notices, Plaintiffs counsel emailed defense counsel the night before the deposition was to occur to advise that due to a misunderstanding, counsel was unavailable to defend the deposition in Miami and Mr. Sherman would not appear the
following day. (DE 81-3, Ex. 1)Defense counsel, who had flown from New York to Miami on the afternoon of May 7, 2012, specifically for the purpose of taking Mr. Sherman's deposition,
advised Plaintiffs counsel that either they would need to reimburse Defendants for their costs or plan to appear for the deposition. Plaintiffs counsel declined both of these alternatives. Hence, Defendants' present motion for sanction.

Now, I'm not a rocket scientist, but I think it says above that COUNSEL was unable to defend due to a misunderstanding. So yes, I can follow along, which it appears some can't...

[SurgeGuy2.0]

Who cares bro! To much focus on a lawsuit that really is just icing on top if they win
It is not the end all be all! Despite the efforts of a fw lol

QSGI will emerge for better any then we can move on which should cause the PPS to spike IMO.