InvestorsHub Logo

risk on

06/25/12 10:45 AM

#64905 RE: havocjohn #64901

This is a pink stock. Those that expect it to excel on all fronts are looking in the wrong venue. That's why I say, let's give credit where due. Had SNEY not over stated the timelines, there would be no legitimate complaint any Sney SH relative to other Cos on the same exchange. Pinks stocks don't have to report ANYTHING. Not only has SNEY pursued exploration of the claim they have in SL, they have also become much more transparent by officially filing with the SEC. They are one 10k and a relatively easy Q away from current. That is something that you as a SH should be proud to say.,

mikeymgd

06/25/12 10:56 AM

#64910 RE: havocjohn #64901

Actually the competence does not jump much on that front either. We have but analytic results that are over 1 year old to go by but still unknown if there are any true results.

The company can move earth from one place to another but can they make money off doing this is still in question.

The only clue that, after a year plus of operations, we have possible reached a point of revenue is the OS. That of course is still questionable since they could have a line of credit, they could have ended operations do to rain, and they could have enough funding currently to not need further dilution.

The incompetence is truly throughout the organization in all facets. Management of the operations, management of the financials, management of the investor relations, and top tier management for not taking advantage of the opportunity that they once had.

Like you said, its not their first rodeo so why so many mess ups?

Well we all wait for the results to what is going on and look forward to a company that will someday become truthful and responsible to the public markets. For now we are a pink sheet company and management is pink sheet company quality. Once current we hope they act more legitimate.