InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dr_lowenstein

06/24/12 11:37 PM

#19626 RE: packerfanbud #19625

If the company decided to forge ahead they would have gotten a letter from the SEC citing the reasons for not declaring the S1 effective. By the way, the language used by the company in the RW is standard legaleze

http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/796764/000095012311090506/c23408rw.htm

http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/ipos/filing.ashx?filingid=7997476

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1494037/000090571812000098/reqwithdr.htm

http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/ipos/filing.ashx?filingid=8121752

lyonthewall.com: Validus requests withdrawal of registration statementPursuant to Rule 477 under the Securities Act of 1933, Validus Holdings hereby requests the withdrawal of the company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File no. 333-175774) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 25, as amended on August 3, August 15, and August 19, together with all exhibits thereto. The company’s request is based on its withdrawal of the exchange offer to which the Registration Statement relates because the conditions set by the company for the completion of the exchange offer were not satisfied as of the expiration time of the exchange offer and Validus did not waive these conditions. Because the proposed offering of the securities under the Registration Statement will not occur, the company believes that the withdrawal of the Registration Statement is consistent with the public interest and the protection of investors, as contemplated by Rule 477(a) of the Securities Act. :thefl