I know...I have biz experience, but not public traded level...I feel dislectic...but I do think this is a purpose full use of language to leave openings to changes...
I know there are atlesst a warrant/book reador here or2??? But they aren't talking either??
Is this just shortens covering-after hedging their investment...and this is their back up plan of they can't get the financing they wan??? I wouldn't blame a warrant holder for hedging his bet with a short...wish I could.
They way I see it as similar to a/s increase before....back up plan to short term cheap paper financing!
They would rather dilute and buyback than get institutional investors a a crappy rate....either way with all the due PRs ......it's gonna gooooo!!!
I got no problem with dilute for 3 months and them repurchase and retire more than originally diluted if this ment better finance???? Cash flow positive???? If they are between checks and need 250k to pay a manufacturer so they can make 50k profit I am more than willing to play........ Just always buy and retire more than dropped by the end of the quater!!