which is why the filing clearly laid out it was a non executive *role/position* >> to me it's semantics >> P2O is JB >> but as i've always posted >> JB will always do what is in the best interests of the co.s LT shareholders >> which is why it wasn't hard for me to figure his *transition* to chief of technology >> Or b4 the aiding and abetting actions in jan >> it would have been CTO (as in officer) >> like i said >> semantics
i try to never miss the forest thru the trees and since *learning the ropes on the poorly watched OTC* i never under estimate any entity when there is this much money at stake
there is literally this much money at stake re: JBII and in due course *almost* everything i've posted specific to reg sho >> percentages >> and covering will come to pass where JBII is concerned >> because the founder of the co. did the impossible specific to what is SOP on the OTC >> and that pertains to the SS (to be envied at this level of the co.s development) to say nothing of *ensuring* P2O's *survival*
waiting to see what the triggers are >>> there are a few possibilities previously outlined by myself et al
perhaps a board poll is due >> for when the next PR/filing/s commence out of mgmt >> i'm split between this week vs the week of july 6th >> as always i see both possibilities
i expect the next PR to be as loaded with details as the last one was on 5/15 >> with the requisite filings to follow
i love PRs' that answer some questions and create many more in turn makes for some revealing threads here on ihub :)