InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RealDutch

06/18/12 6:32 PM

#12566 RE: Traderfan #12565

4.5% ROI every week. Every week!

2 cents. That's your gain every week simply by holding on to the stock. $80M NTA for 2012.

the last thing I wanna be is a "planned long term investor"



That's exactly what you should be.

Most people can't make 4.5% in one year.
I'm not even counting the fact that we will be trading at a normal P/book, P/E, even PEG at some point.

The winners will be the people who can focus. Who can be patient.
That should rule out 95% of the US population. But then, stocks go up with as little people on board as possible.

Einstein said it
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."

This company is not a fraud.
icon url

weeblewobble09

06/18/12 6:49 PM

#12569 RE: Traderfan #12565

scam fears rise as the PPS sinks. If we were at $1.05 I don't think people would be worried. I hate the dilution but at least Solomon spelled it out years ago, although it may be worse than expected.

If SIAF is legit then obviously it's a steal at these levels. At some point we'll probably see a huge jump in the PPS like we did last time it went down to 40 cents.
icon url

The Swede

06/18/12 8:00 PM

#12578 RE: Traderfan #12565

I know what will happen when we up-list to Nasdaq or Amex and then in Stockholm. All the free float will move over to Stockholm and SIAF will be kicked out of the big US list because of weak trading, then we have had all this slaughter for nothing... just bring Siaf home to Sweden without delay!
icon url

treit2002

06/18/12 9:45 PM

#12579 RE: Traderfan #12565




And question 2: if/when will an uplist/dual list perception -- combined with consistent 100% growth -- overtake the "dilution" concerns

You probably anticipate my answer since I posted this a few times here in the past. In my opinion it WON'T while trading in the US




So, since you've identified yourself as mostly short term concerned -- not mutually exclusive from, nor even inconsistent with long term investing -- let me ask you this:

Why would the perception of something happening in the future wait for it to actually happen? If dual listing is a big deal -- and I agree that it is -- why wouldn't the price reflect this beforehand? Maybe a week, maybe a month, maybe a quarter, maybe a year; why not little by little, if there's even a 50% chance that the dual listing will result in a ttm p/e of just 4, a 6 bagger from here!!