InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Billcoln

09/08/05 11:32 PM

#17763 RE: plaintif2000 #17757

The Yankees have a better chance of winning the Super Bowl this year than your nonsense in this post being right.
icon url

stitch_surfs

09/09/05 10:28 AM

#17774 RE: plaintif2000 #17757


by his own admission P2K has had "an experience" with WiFi at a Borders Books I believe it was?

A single experience, what - five years - no more like six years - since the first consumer WiFi products were available, and yet, with all that experience, he makes statements about roaming agreements, and carrier backhaul and "exponential reduction" in bandwidth.

I'm sorry, but in my humble opinion, you don't have a clue what you are talking about. Not to mention that in addition to not having enough basic factual information about traffic engineering on cellular vs IP networks, you're also forgetting that most WiFi endpoints (with the exception of T-Mobile) aren't even carrier owned.

You're talking about revenue shares with every mom and pop coffee shop and all the carriers, the local loop providers, and the list goes on and on...


I can't imagine how you can write that stuff with a straight face. Do you really think what you are saying makes sense?

If so, I would genuinely like to see the references to back up your statements.

In addition, I noticed that you conveniently ignored my direct challenge to you to factually prove that I am another person that has been posting here for a long time. You made the statement, not even an insinuation but a statement, and then when I challenge you to support your statement with evidence you pretend like you didn't even make the remark.

Plaintiff is a legal term. In this country, the courts are supposed to try cases of fact, not opinion, yet every time I ask you for fact, you disregard the post.

-stitch