You got me - I forgot about that post. But, it is still not personal in regards to Jenkins. It is just odd that you and others think that Jenkins is not relevant and seem to be very sensitive to any mention of Jenkins. Discussion of the merits of any stock should include where the information (or misinformation) comes from, the qualifications of that person (or lack thereof), their role as major stockholder or as an officer in the company, and the financial dealings that bind these people together. Jenkins is fair game and his name will come up again, whether from me or someone else.
As for my credibility, whatever. You can judge me all you want, but I know I have never lied or mistated anything on this board or any other, and I think the only reason you are concerned about me is that you know I am right and probably would not want me bringing this stuff up on the GDSM board.
As for who might have PM'd me from the GDSM board, how would you know?
Do you want to talk about the faked Appraisal Report?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
