Don't rule it out...
Have am not pointing fingers at anyone, but will use the following scenario to illustrate how a large market cap can be generated by a small number of traders...
Trader "A" buys the stock at 20 cents because his interpretation of that chart suggests it will move higher. The stock moves as he suspected and he sells to trader "B", who thinks there is more room to run. Turns out trader "B" was right and the stock keeps going up. Now momo trader "C" decides to buy, and throw in a frustrated trader "A" that decides to rebuy...
...a very few number of active traders can run a stock up.
The same scenario applies to running the share price down via selling short. "A" sells short betting the stock will go down. If his bet is right he buys from "B" to cover his short to book his gain, but "B" believes the stock will continue to fall, and is selling to "A" short. In steps momo trader "C" and a frustrated tradr "A" to short it more... same result.
A few people passing a stock back and forth can make a difference. In reality it takes a pretty good number because the shareholder population of an issue will have their entry/exit points. The larger the percentage of traders in a company's shares, the more likely extreme volatility will result.
I mentioned a stock several of us on this board owned a decade ago... it went from 37 cents to 29 DOLLARS in just SEVEN MONTHS.
I'm not suggesting that will happen here, just that under the right circumstances, it could.