InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Militia Man

06/10/12 10:17 PM

#73767 RE: janice shell #73757

Lol.. My point was hypothetical and shorting into those days is or was plausible, I figured most could figure that out. Maybe not the DOJ, none the less. But wait, why not? If they have to do what they have to do to bust some one, why not short into the fake instigated run?

Are you suggesting that the FBI only goes long to make a case? lol I highly doubt it is one of those.. Hey Charlie don't break the rules with that $1,472 bucks were using to do this sting agianst Cotton. Keep in mind there is no such thing in the USA as shorting sub penny stocks.. So keep it clean and hit the ask.. Go long! lmao

The chart shows no significant volume or share price movement on the 8 & 9th March 2010. There is significant movement in share price two days in advance of the PR percentage wise, which it is far more significant than the 8th PR day and the 9th the day after with no follow through. It then preceded to fall until April with a real nice dump.. The charts don't lie.. Nor does the text data I mentioned that precedes and follows the action imo..

So, can selling shares into the ask create the illusion of a run up in motion, yes or no? If so when that selling wanes and there is no new buyers the stock may fall from lack of support, right? Add on bombardment of negativity like we witnessed then and the more recent time, where we see significant changes in share prices. Like the recent raid from $.004 down to $.0006 on the DOJ news against Cotton.. What is the % gain there? If I was to short from $.004 down to $.0006? Think that is a motivator when news of a CEO has been indicted? Naw! I didn't think so.. To risky for off shore shorty.. God knows it is to expensive in the USA to do it, thus making it a mute point.. lol lol lol