Replies to post #91191 on Pacific Gold Corp fka PCFG

[bababeely]

Thanks for posting that. His response ticks me off.
In the CC, it was stated that they would post videos on the
website, and now he's saying go refer to youtube. It doesn't
take much effort to post a video.

[RoboTrader]

As I've said before, PCFG is not ready to play with the big boys. They respond to shareholders in such a way that they're completely unprofessional. I mean, really? lmao, the red flags on this company just keep coming up one after another.

I doubt they'll ever be playing with the big boys.

\\//_

[Phred6]

The company spent $58,265 in cash and gave 3,000,000 shares (@ $.01 per share) for advertising last quarter which didn't accomplish a thing. The share price is lower now and no substantive news about the water issue being solved. You could get a really good website up and running for that price. Your email exchange with Mitch only contributes to the doubt surrounding PCFG. Does anyone think that the Evergreen report, the cluttering of the board for a couple of days and the ensuing drop in share price was worth the money?

We've had videos before and they heightened expectations of imminent, profitable production which were dashed when the production numbers came out. If you think about it, it's a little ridiculous when investors have to go out to the middle of the Great Basin desert just to verify that the plant is even running. Until the production numbers are available nobody knows nothing.

We're almost two months into the third quarter and still don't know if the water issue is solved. Some make a big deal of news releases costing a lot. You could get a lot of news releases out for $58,265. That is if there really was any news. \V/_