Carry it over here --- RE: "The lengthy history of pump and dump activity makes IDCN a much shadier shell than ANWM was when it was suspended. Did he learn nothing from the ANWM suspension?"
I agree with the 1st part of your statement. I realize that most will continue to challenge me when I say, "could also route from Bruhjell and can also route to Robin Brass (the convicted sister)." Bottom line, your incrimination of KA has about as much credibility as my previous sentence referencing the former ceo and his sister. Is there a real possibility that idcn would have been halted even if a shareholder meeting happened and a name change never occurred? Absolutely! Just look at the last 8 months of idcn, alone. JRB played a juggle game with 3 different sets of directors. A shareholder overthrew the ceo by a court order. The ceo's sister was indicted and the docs show that she played the 'idcn atm game' just like her brother did. If the sec eyes weren't on idcn with just that, then they are completely inept and hopeless. I cannot fathom that the sec possibly missed that 8 month block of Indocan publicity.
Last, you mentioned "unjustified volume spike (in so many words)." Understand, the entire life of idcn was volume spikes and price appreciation. Most of the volume that i've seen since the late 90's was on no news at all. Much of idcn's life was spent dormant and that's why I debate this "oh, KA believe JRB for 10 years?" Most of those 10 years idcn did not trade or trickled a little.