SO...as it turns out even after a posting to inquire WHO removed the post....* With NO response from YOU it turns out that it was YOU who removed it initially. (Actually I figured as much)....of course , it was NOT YOU who reinstated that post .. WAS IT?
HERE IS THE PROBLEM.......this company has prompted who these persons are in various mediums, press releases and online communications. Their roles and participation with the ongoing growth (or lack of) is in fact MATERIAL to THE ARN. YOUR CFO is listed in virtually all documents associated with the company.......the company has releases press announcing the DRTV Campiagn and OTHER initiatives that have not materialized to date.....so my question to YOU (or to whomever at the company would like to reply is this........each of those persons are in some "capacity" with this company...they have emails that are easily accessed in public domain......they have had their names associated with this company and in past communications to SHs... these SAME individuals have been named as being key players in the future growth of the company......SO .... WHY Is it problem in SHs communication to ANY OF THEM.......My guess is each of them hold stock in the company and it seems they would want to be proactive in MAKING SOMETHING HAPPEN!
YOU KNOW.....ALL This is easily remedied by creating a level of transparency to the SHAREHOLDERS.
REVENUE SOLVES ALL PROBLEMS (INCLUDING SHARE VALUE!)
IS THERE ANYTHING ABOUT THAT STATEMENT THAT IS NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD ....KATHY ....PAUL ????
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
