Replies to post #186890 on Winning Brands Corporation (WNBD)

[louisa]

Morning Dave,

How do you know this about this?

Many of the larger properties are requiring spray triggers on the bottles, and it's now up to Winning Brands to decide whether a production run of this type will be feasible in regards to the anticipated sales to this sector. Not blaming the hotels, just simply stating the reasons (fault) for the delay.

Did Eric blog about this> If so, I may have missed it.

TIA

[doogdilinger]

I'm not the one who blogged about the 30 active hotels now in the 2nd month of Q1 or threw out the $600K projection number if 100 hotels became active in 2012.

In fact I could honestly care less that the company chose not to discuss the 30 hotels in their Q1 summary even though they blogged about adding 20 hotels on feb 7th.

If the 100 hotel ambitions for 2012 got put on hold due to spray trigger desires during Q1 why was it not blogged about at the time? The blogs have stated countless times that they're there to provide shareholders with the utmost of total and complete transparency unlike all of wnbd's pinksheet peers. So who's fault is it if the spray trigger issue was just brought to light today by some ihub poster who was granted permission to post an email response just received by the company?

It's not about fault and/or blame...it's about constantly doing ones due and always attempting to figure out all the always in motion market dynamics involved