InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jugygales

05/17/12 6:28 AM

#1009 RE: ridinbulls #1008

I think it depends on when they submitted the information for that abstract. If they submitted it back in January they might of had only 120 patients enrolled.
icon url

TheBroker73

05/17/12 10:08 AM

#1011 RE: ridinbulls #1008

Those abstracts were submitted February 1, prior to the enrollment figures we have recently seen in SEC docs.

This abstract I felt to be very positive results as they reviewed the patients from phase 1. 6 out of 16 still alive ranging from a disease free time of 44-63 months----that is incredible. 38% of those treated with ICT-107 still going strong for a disease that has a 95% mortality rate with standard of care alone.

http://abstract.asco.org/AbstView_114_100544.html