The only thing that really matters is that there is a separation of the SEC list and what MDGC is. I'm well aware of all the DD on this company (none of it being positive), including it's Scull status, suspicious trading activity, and new shares entering the market. But, what I've seen with this SEC "clearly dormant" list is statements all over the boards trying to give the impression that just because some "company" (very loose term) is not on it, that must mean it's ok. NOT.
"Trying to erroneously state or insinuate that because MDGC wasn't on the list makes this company OK or in the clear of many other type of SEC investigations was the "shuffling" I noticed.
The SEC list of long dormant stocks does not give reason to have any "shuffling" of responsibilities that this company has for it's reporting standards, accuracy, transparency, and coming through with all of it's proclamations that it hasn't done in years."
That would put me in agreement and suggest anyone to "do some DD" before holding or entering this stock.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
