Replies to post #101061 on Profitable Developments, Inc. (PRDL)

[ThSeeker]

Point is John agrees with you. It is fair to ask. Fact is he would produce them even if no one asked. But they do not exist. They are being created now or soon. I meant, you said "not releasing them" and "not fair to hide them" which sounds like he is not intending to release or has them and is not releasing them. Truth is He can't release what he does not yet have. They are coming. If that is the case it is not a red flag. If he was hiding them or not going to have them completed then that would be a red flag.

He told me he intends to be transparent and release info important to us be it good or bad. Example he told us we will not be starting mining to Jan 13. That by most people is not what they want to hear. But it is the truth and important. Other things such as financials also important will be released. Even though he knows that will not attract investors, in terms of what it contains. But it is the right and necessary thing to do. But he can't get it all done immediately.

Email him or call him if you have request for specific info. It may help add content to future PRs. He works that way. He listens and tries to respond as he can via PRs. He intends to have conf calls and field reports on a regular basis in the future etc.

[Sailboat1]

Givens:

1.) There are 557 "followers" of STHG on this message board
2.) STHG is looking for $400,000 to begin mining this 5-acres in SL.

A thought:

If only 1/2 of "us" (278) would simply cough up $1,438.84 . . . you all could start mining tomorrow! After all, 18.5 g/ton (concentrate) ought to make $$ flow as easily as that river in SL.

Bottom-line: think about it long and hard before dropping a cent into this slot machine. Example: No test-bores reported (to ID the size distribution of the claim - AU does NOT evenly distribute itself in nature.) Non-concentrate test-bore samples should have been assayed & reported properly (with chain of custody documentation, etc.)