No can do. I am not going to spend hours of my time writing thousands of words for your benefit. If you do not want to see the truth, that is fine by me. If you cannot see it, that's fine by me too. i am familiar with the process of spending two minutes asking a question that takes hours to answer, which then can be followed by another two minute question that againtakes hours to answer.
If I tell you not to jump before you look, and if instead of looking, you ask a question, then, go ahead and jump. Are you willing to pay me $10K up front? I didn't think so.
The same thing happened when BH was in charge of RLTR and I complained about the way business was being handled. The only thing different at that time was that I thought BH was inept and that, in a short time, he would get it right. Unfortunately, like MF, I didn't realize he was a crook until it was too late.
The same kind of distraction is going on at BCCI right now: people wanting long, winding answer because they either do not want to do their own research or want to sidetrack me. I am writing for the newcomers, and they are free to ignore me. I am not writing to please you.
However, I know it doesn't matter much what I say. maybe it doesn't matter at all. Sooner or later, a couple of people will make a deal with RLTR and lose their money. Maybe along the way the stock goes up.
Those who disagree with me in their writing here should concentrate not on having me explain my position but on providing good reasoning for their bullishness. After all, that is the only way to make the stock go up, if it is possible. Asking me to defend my bearishness is counterproductive, since, if I took the bait, all I could do is convince people not to buy. But if you are a bull or someone who is faking bullisheness, the only way about helping the stock go up is to be proactive by reasoning out the case for bullishness; not by demanding that the bear explains himself. That is so counterproductive that it leads no where.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
