Exactly, and if there is no dilution, why isn't the TA allowed to offer up full S/S information?
Any company instructing the TA to withhold share structure information, or that intentionally uses a specific TA that will withhold and pretend that's normal business (LOL!), is hiding the share structure for a reason.
So what is the magical rule that says that MDGCs DTC/C status prevents dilution?
The documented proof is by definition there doesn't need to be any documented proof. Call your broker if you don't believe me that is proof in itself. As far as dilution goes how can you issue more shares and dilute a stock when the clearing firm won't let your TA issue no more shares due to a freeze.
Proof by definition is all you need. If you doubt what i say call your broker otherwise prove that a stock that is DTC chilled on deposits can dilute. The proof can go both ways the difference is by definition my proof is legitimate by definition your assertion is contradictory anybody that has taken any type of mathematics or debate class or anything of that nature can assert that proof by definition is a valid proof and in order to disprove something you have to create a contradiction that violates said definition.
Please refer to the previous post for the definition of DTC Chilled. If you would like i can post the definition of Dilution too which would contradict a DTC Freeze on Deposit. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW YOU CAN DILUTE A STOCK IF YOU CANNOT DEPOSIT SAID STOCK INTO THE CLEARING HOUSE THAT TRADES THEM?!?!?!
If there is some confusion about what goes on behind the scenes with the DTC/NSCC, Clearing firms and brokers and so forth you can get a better understanding of how the stock market works by visiting here: