frog, you actually had replied, so i wasn't expecting more. you provided your "maybe" response to whether you and frud are one and the same. lol.
the point of my post to you didn't revolve around "denying the claim"....but yet you've chosen to pursue that in your response, interesting imo. given that train of thought, your assumption that ONLY 2 reasons for not "denying the claim" appear to be quite short sighted for the usual analytical frog that we've become accustomed to.
consider the fact that the claim had NOTHING to add to my original post commenting on how you rushed to defend frud with information that 1) most here wouldn't have EVER remembered, or cared to remember 2) most here wouldn't have wasted their time researching it;
and all this in an attempt to prop up frud's alias.....
something that even he elected not to do....
but you did....thus the "tied to the hip" analysis concerning your mission here and the issues you choose to defend and the question as to whether you are frud???
and we all saw how you replied to that question: "maybe"....thus, what conclusions should we draw from that reply??....i have not assumed anything and somehow feel as though you didn't receive the play you had hoped for out of your reply....
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
