InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dave68723

04/26/12 9:43 PM

#13144 RE: proUBRG #13143

That's what I have been saying. A reverse split in the near term is a bad idea. They just simply need to show some profit and the pps will increase.

When is that dmn shareholder meeting suppose to be se we can all get some answers rather than guessing.
icon url

6sigma6

04/26/12 10:08 PM

#13145 RE: proUBRG #13143

Revenue before profit. I used procera because in the past, they were just revenue making machine. Same as UBRG. Anyway, I would like to see an independent member of the board like Krysti suggested.


Quite frankly, I'm not a big fan of these 'common stock' issuance now. It seems quite never ending, IMHO (See 10Q/K's for the past 2 years) although it has slowed down significantly. I'd like to see MORE transparency on why and who are we paying. Would be nice to let us know ahead because EITHER WAY. They have to disclose.

I'd like to see the reduction of cost of sales, I'm not sure why its almost the same as retail anyway. Whats the strategy there? Its been two years, we have BIG number of contracts (still vague on that one, no details, nothing to compute ahead).

What happened again to Progas and Whitesburg? Show us some more detail! More NUMBERS, REAL NUMBERS.
icon url

gauvdog

04/27/12 6:23 AM

#13156 RE: proUBRG #13143

Great post!