That makes no sense, whatsoever, Pete. Ken is acting "custodian" right now. That is not an officer. Previously, Ken was "Investor Relations." That was not an officer either. Ken posting while he was "Investor Relations" is a non-issue. ----->
RE: "I disagree with you that Ken is not currently an officer of IDCN but let's say you are right and he's not and that is the reason he shouldn't post. That didn't stop him previously and according to you he wasn't an officer then either."
& that is as "full blown opinion" as it could get, with no support nonetheless! KA's failure to post while JRB is gone is mysterious now???? Why?? What does that have to do with anything? KA posted while JRB was a ceo in hiding. So what? You are suggesting that KA can come out of hiding when he's not, nor has ever been, in hiding.
It's not suspicious at all that KA is not speaking. Again, he is custodian only! What do you want him to tell you? A shareholder initiated a lawsuit. JRB was tossed. Do you want him to announce "business" as the custodian? That really is not up to him at all. & yes, his absence makes total sense and by no means supports any of your theories, no even one slightly. ----->
RE: "HIS FAILURE TO POST, TALK TO INVESTORS PUBLICLY NOW THE BIG BAD WOLF HAS GONE IS AT BEST A REAL MYSTERY. AT WORST IT IS HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS.
YOU BANG ON ABOUT HOW JRB WAS THE PROBLEM BUT NOW HE'S GONE ("APPARENTLY") JUST WHEN YOU THINK KA COULD SPEAK FREELY WE STILL GET NOTHING!!!!!! DOESN'T MAKE SENSE UNLESS YOU SUBSCRIBE TO OTHER THEORIES OF MINE."
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
