Replies to post #30676 on NewStream Energy Technologies Group Inc (NSGP)

[asegal1228]

Laboratory simulation does not equal validation.

Hence the 10K entry under "Risk Factors" entitled:

"We do not know if coal processed using our technology is commercially viable."

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=74691589

I also find the entry you referenced to be highly suspect considering the fact that there is no link or reference to these supposed studies, i.e. who, how, when, under what conditions, tests performed, signature of accredited technician, and contact information, ect.. that you would expect to see if someone actually validated the supposed technology.

I think you have to understand the nature of simulation. They did not simulate CCTI's supposed technology. The simulation was based on using CCTI's supposed technology from numbers claimed by the company imo.

In case you aren't aware, the "inventor", Larry Hunt, is a life long con man and convicted felon. And his right hand man, CJ Douglas seems to be quite the unscrupulous individual. Go do some digging on these clowns and then tell us why we should trust them. BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE DOING IF YOU BELIEVE THE SIMULATION. You are trusting the numbers that they are giving out and that are based on ... what are they based on? You see we don't know. They haven't implemented the tech on any scale so they sure as heck aren't based anything real.

Also there does not appear that there is anything that proves that CCTI used a simulation developed at Carnegie-Mellon nor that Carnegie-Mellon validated CCTI's claims in any way.

jmho