InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TradingBulls

04/18/12 12:10 PM

#80728 RE: Old Tymer #80726

icu2uknow you're getting ahead of yourself!

Unless you have inside information then you cannot be assured that they don't have that.

Fact is, you speculate to the negaive for a reason. Sorry don;t think you will get a reload at .0001 but nice try.
icon url

silkrider

04/18/12 12:23 PM

#80731 RE: Old Tymer #80726

Be careful, thats considered off-topic and a personal attack
icon url

silkrider

04/18/12 12:34 PM

#80737 RE: Old Tymer #80726

icu,agree 100%, it was stated as final value, and of course that's most likely from current property appraisals in that area, none of the reports stated what property was owned outright-or if they owed for example 2.5 mil on those valued properties and walked out of closing with a check for a few 100 g's. No cash amount was ever disclosed up to this point. My posts were deleted this am for confronting thats why I said careful lol. Cant be negative on this board, just pump pump pump.
icon url

Monarchs96

04/18/12 12:35 PM

#80740 RE: Old Tymer #80726

ICU,

None of us know what is going to happen. For anyone to be adamant as to the next direction would be thoughtless. Greg's comments about protecting shareholder wealth makes me believe that a R/S split would not be considered.

Could I be wrong? Absolutely.