InvestorsHub Logo

blackhawks

04/17/12 6:45 PM

#6065 RE: hawkeye612 #6064

So with your rambling post what is your point? You believe then that the pps would be affected by posting less then stellar numbers? When the stock is trading 90% less then it should be anyway?



Sorry that complex sentences are such a challenge for you. But, yeah, considering that all of the so called 'DD' and 'valuation' estimates were creating 'expectations', less than stellar numbers would've knocked it down a point or 2 and left it trading sideways at the lower price while awaiting yet more 'news'.

And what exactly about current pps supports your contention that UNGS is trading "90% less than it should be".