InvestorsHub Logo

EarnestDD

04/13/12 7:42 PM

#27321 RE: was SaltLife #27320

That sums up PHAR. Howard is Shady and he is employing Shady practices with PHAR.
jmo

not letting shareholders know where you have moved to or even giving notice of their intent is very shady practice.

pharce buster

04/13/12 8:37 PM

#27322 RE: was SaltLife #27320

Must have been a quick and easy move to make with just a cell phone in the office. lol JMO

Snizzle

04/13/12 9:30 PM

#27323 RE: was SaltLife #27320

No worries here man, PHAR is one of the most resilient companies and stocks out there. It's on the way back up and can't be stopped no matter how much effort goes into trying to stop it.

IMO

Snizzle

04/13/12 9:31 PM

#27324 RE: was SaltLife #27320

So tour saying funding has been secured to purchase a new building for PHAR ? Good to hear!

Go PHAR!

IMO

Snizzle

04/13/12 9:32 PM

#27326 RE: was SaltLife #27320

The company will let shareholders know of any SIGNIFICANT changes as they see fit. I heard **** BIG NEWS **** will come soon enough!

IMO

Snizzle

04/13/12 9:33 PM

#27328 RE: was SaltLife #27320

PHAR ready to move up to the 2-4 cent range on any significant financing news!

IMO

Snizzle

04/13/12 9:35 PM

#27331 RE: was SaltLife #27320

Where is the new WordWide Headquarters of PHAR that you speak of?

Snizzle

04/13/12 9:36 PM

#27332 RE: was SaltLife #27320

Surely you would know where PHAR moved to if you know they moved,correct? None of which is public knowledge as far I know!


IMO

Snizzle

04/13/12 9:38 PM

#27333 RE: was SaltLife #27320

How did you hear of financing being secured for PHAR? That's not public knowledge either.....is it?

IMO

Snizzle

04/13/12 9:40 PM

#27334 RE: was SaltLife #27320

What exactly was the good of paying rent on a building that was not to be in use until Aquaprin is mass produced?

That like renting a storage unit and keeping it empty, makes no sense.


IMO

Snizzle

04/13/12 9:41 PM

#27335 RE: was SaltLife #27320

Have you been able to contact Howard lately on any of your concerns with PHAR ?? It appears not!


IMO