Replies to post #31720 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Hopeful107]

You will never see a poor man or investor complain about someone who is trying to better his life. Do you think the Begger on the road "bitch" to the Good Samaritan. NO. But i'll bet there were a few self rightest who stood buy Criticising and judging the good Samaritan for helping the poor slob.

[chrisbaskett]

Hopeful, I am not rich and I have a problem with it. If he is right? His forcasting record has been about 10% correct if that. If he is right on this he is releasing inside information. He is nothing but a pest on this board but hey....

Chris

[Easyman51]

Hopeful107, I am neither rich nor privy to indsider information from DnaPrint Genomics.

It is well documented that there are those who utilize information for personal gain and disseminate this info to their friends and cohort in advance of "public domain", which to me is not only extreemly unfair, but criminal. This is why I hold Martha Stewart in distain. Although I "expect" this type of behavior from some, I certainly don't condone it. Rumor mongers are a part of society, but putting a face value on something takes it out of this category, imho. To me it has become very "specific" in nature and taken it out of the category of "rumor". It could be that jeveer00 has access to this information thru channels that are perfectly legitimate, just as those who follow DnaPrint will probably know of it's breakthru before Mr. John Doe does. One thing is certain, Msrs. Gabriel holds the key to disseminating information relevant to DnaPrint Genomics and is responsible for containment in regards to SEC, unless I am missing the gist of what I have read earlier. I would purpose to the Board Moderator that this latest post be looked into and presented to DnaPrint Genomics if that amount of revenue deal is real. If not, then I would appeal to Matt to respond as he see's fit.