Right, I understand the Trade for Trade designation but I was wondering about the statement "it only effects Penson", is that your statement or is that a statement posted on the board. I should have clarified it more.
I found it ironic the guy leading the “Remove the DTCC Chill” is now the CEO of such a company. So apparently the strategy is not proactive but in fact a reactive one if they are even trying to do anything…lol
The legend of chill removal is more of making a lot out of nothing. He did not get a T4T designation removed, in worked out a DWAC issue for CBAI, which is not a big deal in comparison to an exited CUSIP from CNS and T4T designation.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
