Replies to post #22386 on Viaspace, Inc. (VSPC)

[hedge_fun]

Great question about GKG YIELD from the hood.......

Why has VSPC never had YIELD independently verified, right? When you look at the presentation on the website, other grasses mentioned have sources cited backing VSPC's claims, but not GKG!

Page 5 of the presentation here.......not one source is cited that verifies the YIELD of GKG anywhere, unless I missed it.

http://www.viaspacegreenenergy.com/docs/2nd%20Biomass%20&%20Pellets%20Update%20Asia%20VIASPACE.pdf

I actually sent Karl an email and CC'd Jan asking about independent testing of GKG YIELD, but have not received a response.

$22K in grass sales in 3 years, and $7K was from logs.

VSPC couldn't be LYING, could they? Why would you use a safe harbor statement with a presentation that is suppose to be "scientific" and other wise accurate? Page 2

Maybe they just think GKG will YIELD as much as they claim sometime in the future.........or could, or might, or hope, or ???? what the freak?

: Information in this presentation includes forward-looking
statements which relate to future events or performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

I wouldn't have a problem with the safe harbor statement if they had verified testing of the yield and those responsible stood behind the results and explain how they were achieved.