Thank you for your input Sparky. Good work. What makes your post(s) meaningful is that it provides the other side of a heavily biased perspective. It is not all doom and gloom as the other poster posits (It exists, yes, but it is used here, ad nauseam, to perpetuate a singular agenda: to protect and preserve an inept mgmt). More importantly, your remark suggests that management may be a major contributing factor to this company's troubles, to which I couldn't agree more.
The other side would have you believe that management is merely an administrative role player in the company operation, whose success is predicated by either macro/industry trends or late stage scientific data which caters to those trends; whose punctuality in results relies only on vacations of researchers; whose trials can only be completed if the coordinator doesn't die; whose salaries/options are acceptable based on how they stack up to industry 'peers' (and I say that word loosely), regardless of YOY stock performance and drug advancement. Their interests are aligned with that of a cattle farmer, and their results consistent with the subsequent slaughter of the bovines, one by one. They only have a couple left.
At last, when it is over, it will be our time to roast the pigs and feast! Ham, bacon anyone?
I can see it now...
The Story of Cortex: From Corx to Pork (alternative subtitle: From Cor to Poor)
Ps. This is figurative: I am not an advocate of heavy meat consumption. I also don't condone the consuming of pork derived from mgmnt--I believe it is tainted :)
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
